References / What we don't measure against
We don't crown one spec or repeat miracle percentages
UnconfirmedMarketing sometimes names one spec the single most important factor, or repeats a headline like 400 percent more effective, often waving toward a NASA study. We don't make single-factor or percentage-benefit claims about a device.
Why we leave it out
There is a real NASA technical paper on time-varying fields and cultured cells, and we cite it elsewhere on this page as context, but it studied cells in a dish under one condition, measured no health outcome, and never crowned a single factor or promised a percentage. A device's output depends on strength, frequency, waveform, and timing together. We report what we measured on the device in front of us and skip the superlatives.